Looking at possibly my favourite or one of them, primarily because it took me a long time to tie this well done horse into a set of riders, and it was pure luck that I did so, but I'm now over 75/80% confident I've done so, if I wasn't, I wouldn't be posting them.
This is basically the old Crescent horse, which as a Hong Kong hollow horse I call 'Wavymane' (because when I was naming them I was a dedicated small-scale collector and wasn't familiar with the Crescent horse), but with the wave removed, or sculpted over, but with no other visible changes, the good musculature of the Wavymane remains, and the quality is high, equal to the early examples of Wavymanes.
Colours are mostly realistic, and a wide palette of chestnut, dun, and rowans accompanies the usual black and white horses, and a couple of marbled grey/brown And this is about half the entire sample, which had come-in in ones and twos, usually in larger mixed lots, but one or two on their own, with a bunch of Airfix or Matchbox mixed figures, something like that.
They never came with an obvious figure, the kind of large mixed lots (dealers have always throne all these hollow-horses and their associated figures/accessories in a big bag, tray or tin) of small scale junk, are hard to ID things from But were easy to ID once I new what I was looking for, and slowly they built up; during one of the 'Big Sorts', I went through the many thousands of Wavymanes, and found a few more, where some were hiding from before I'd recognised them.
There are three marking variations so far identified, and with such a small sample, there may be more one day, but using the lower picture of black horses, we have in the middle (as the rowan) a clear HONG KONG (with a gap) and a bump, forward of the saddle position, on a flat underside, at the bottom, a less clear HONGKONG (no gap, both in a round sans-serif font) on an all flat underside, and a pointed domed cavity with no markings at the top (as the dun).
It took maybe 30-odd years to finally 'call' these, when one of the dozens of bags in the last big-sort, proved to be pretty clean,, maybe one or two obvious other-runners or runts, and suddenly I had a half-dozen or so, clean Pre-Wavys with matching riders.
Turning to the two bags of still unidentified figures, I found, among the 60-odd figures a dozen or so more, and this is most of them (one of each colour/per pose, I think). Again, there's a couple of thousand waiting sorting from the last few years (I don't buy, or 'hoover up' this stuff like I used to), mostly from the donations of Adrian Little, Chris Smith or Peter Evans, and a few big bags from the Plastic Warrior show, including this year, when I got a big bag of well mixed hollow--horse stuff, so there may be a few more to add by now,, but it may only be another half-dozen, maybe less.
The figures are early post-Giant copies of the six (and it's only six) Giant poses along with five (two Indian and three cowboy) of the poses associated first with 'Wavymane', but again, given the small sample, the other seven of that 'set' may turn-up in the future.
The obvious identifying features are the bright colours in a quite pastel palette, and the relatively neat, ball-ended locating studs on the riders calves, which while similar to Giant's, lack the cone-like shafts of the Giant versions.
The figures are copies/sub-piracies of those associated with Wavymane, and specifically the mini-forts from the small 'pull-bags', with the two holes/release-pin marks missing,, and a Hong Kong mark, and, while again, a small sample, it looks like they are all coloured to match the rider, and more poses are still to be found.
I have a feeling though, there may be a bunch more somewhere, which could mean they were bought in by another hollow-horse issuer, or that the foot figure attribution is less solid, maybe 50% or less, only time, and the next Big Sort will tell?
It's quite a faint mark, and it was easier to fade out the colour and tone down the contrast to illustrate it. On the Wavymane figures small holes, like golf-holes are found roughly under the feet, here the base is smooth other that the raised mark, and the figures are of a poorer quality than the donors, which were with an early version of Wavymane, and are, obviously, also, copies of the Britains Swoppet 54mm originals.
This is the entire sample, and one of the best tests of whether you've ID'd them correctly, is how the various items add up, and here it's about right, with the foot figures being a slightly smaller sample, but there may have been less of them per issue, or they may only have been included in some iterations/sets, or as stated, as a caveat above, they may be interlopers?
But compare the bag of foot figures, with the bag of mounted cowboys and there's nothing in it, so I think I've called it right, it's just that I think I may have more foot figures somewhere, and they may be in the unattributed box?
Note, each element gets a 4x5½" bag, and all four bags join the horses in a 6x9" bag, they will get three Pelt drawings (with more added if new marking variants turn up), and a large index card stiffens the bag (so it can stand up in the box with the other one-off samples), where all the other notes are to be found, including findings, sample sizes, how many foot and mounted were found together, &etc.
My own feeling, given how few turn up, how they turn up in single figures, and the overall better quality of them, is that they may have been Christmas cracker exclusives, or an unremembered comic/cereal/other food premium?
===============================================================
But is it Giant
No, easier for unscrupulous dealers or ignorant sellers to claim so, do to the quality of the horses, and the similarity of some of the mounted figures, but they are not Giant, they are a minor group, possibly used as premiums of some kind, cracker toys or gum-ball capsule machine prizes?















